Invite-only research archive
155,000+ UDRP and ccTLD domain dispute decisions from 14 providers, read into one vocabulary. See how panels ruled on facts like yours, which counsel actually win, and who is squatting on your brand, before you file, hire, or respond.
Work email only. Reviewed by a person, no password. Already invited? Sign in.
WIPO · Forum · CAC · ADNDRC · CIIDRC · AFNIC · Nominet · MFSD · CEPANI · CRDD · Danish Complaints Board · Internetstiftelsen · Register.si · EISi, refreshed nightly, hundreds of new decisions a month.
| Provider | Representative | Company | Brand | Domain | Bad faith | Response | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIPO | Hartwell LLP | Nordvik Outdoor AB | NORDVIK | nordvik-shop.com | Phishing | None | Transfer |
| Forum | Delmar IP Group | Quillon Pharma Inc. | QUILLAREX | quillarex-rx.com | Counterfeit | Procedural | Transfer |
| CAC | Studio Ferraro | Belmonte Moda | BELMONTE | belmonte-sale.net | Typosquatting | Wrong forum | Transfer |
| AFNIC | Cabinet Delorme | Maison Arlenne SAS | ARLENNE | arlenne.fr | Serial abuse | Fair use | Transfer |
| Nominet | Ashby Marks Ltd | Corrin Foods plc | CORRIN | corrin.co.uk | Passive holding | Generic term | Denied |
| CIIDRC | Self-represented | Lumetra Labs Corp. | LUMETRA | lumetra.ca | Offer to sell | Business relationship | Split |
Who it's for
Providers publish decisions one at a time, on their own sites, in their own words. Libra puts them side by side so the question you actually have gets an answer in seconds.
Pull every decision on a fact pattern, in any language, and see how panels split on it.
Every firm's record on cases like yours, its clients, and the estimated spend those cases cost.
Check a domain or a registrant name against 260,000 disputed domains, by hand or by API.
What's inside
Each decision is parsed, normalised, and enriched: outcome, domains, parties, counsel, panel, bad-faith grounds, response defences, citations, and an English translation where needed.
"Transferred", "Accepted", "Granted", "Cancellation", "Complaint denied", "Rejected": every provider's wording is mapped onto transfer, cancelled, denied, split, terminated. Compare a Czech CAC decision with a WIPO one without a spreadsheet.
| Provider | Case | Domain | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| WIPO | D2025-···· | brand-login.com | Transfer |
| Forum | FA···· | brandsecure.net | Transfer |
| CAC | 10···· | brand-eu.org | Denied |
| AFNIC | FR-···· | brand-support.fr | Split |
| Nominet | D···· | brand-uk.co.uk | Transfer |
Illustration. Real screens show real case numbers; no real party names appear on this page.
Every complainant representative, extracted from the decision and merged across providers. Cases, win rate, split rate, and the share of their filings a panel called Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. Click through to the client list and the estimated spend behind it.
| Firm | Cases | Won | RDNH |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firm A | 412 | 0.2% | |
| Firm B | 268 | 0.0% | |
| Firm C | 151 | 3.9% | |
| Firm D | 97 | 1.0% |
Illustrative figures.
2,400+ panelists ranked by caseload, transfer rate, and how they compare with the ten busiest others. Combine several to see a three-member panel's record together. Know the bench before you draft.
| Cases | Transfer | Denied | Responded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This panelist | 1,180 | 91% | 6% | 14% |
| Top-10 average | 1,455 | 89% | 8% | 12% |
Illustrative figures.
Phishing, typosquatting, counterfeit, passive holding, PPC parking, sale to the owner, pattern of abuse, competitor disruption, traffic diversion, tarnishment, malware, MX abuse. Every decision carries the grounds the panel relied on, and every formal Response carries the defences it raised, whether or not they worked.
Illustration. Wording is paraphrased.
Every analysis section is embedded, so you can open any decision and pull the ones whose reasoning is closest, across providers, years, and languages. Named reasoning patterns group decisions that share a justification. The citation graph shows which decisions panels keep coming back to.
Illustrative figures.
Search your brand with one or two character edits, Cyrillic and Greek lookalikes, accented letters, digit swaps. Stored IDNs are kept as punycode so a lookalike in another script is still found. Filter by TLD or by second-level label length.
| paypa1.com | Transfer |
| pаypal.com (Cyrillic а) | Transfer |
| paypall.net | Transfer |
| paipal.org | Denied |
Illustration.
How access works
Libra is a closed research database, not an open website. That is what lets it hold the full text of every decision. Access is by invitation. We ask for your name, company, title, and a work email.
Name, company, title, and a work email. Free addresses such as Gmail are not accepted. We keep those details only to decide on the request.
Astra staff review the request and add your address to the invite list. You get an email when it is done.
Continue with Google, or have a one-time link emailed to you. No password to remember or leak.
Questions
Yes. Libra is a search across the UDRP and ccTLD decisions those providers publish: WIPO, Forum, CAC, ADNDRC, CIIDRC, and the country-code archives listed above. Reading them inside Libra takes an invitation. The providers' own sites remain the public source for each decision.
From the decisions the dispute providers themselves publish: WIPO, Forum, CAC, ADNDRC, CIIDRC, MFSD, AFNIC, Nominet, CEPANI, CRDD, the Danish Complaints Board, Internetstiftelsen, Register.si and EISi. Libra reads them, extracts the structured fields, and links back to the source for every case.
An incremental crawl runs nightly on every provider. Hundreds of new decisions land each month, typically within days of publication.
Counsel, brand and trademark teams, registrars and abuse teams, and researchers with a professional reason to read dispute decisions. Requests need a name, company, title, and a work address. Free email such as Gmail is not accepted. A person at Astra reviews each one.
Yes. Exact-domain lookup and fuzzy registrant search are available over REST with a Bearer key issued by Astra staff. Ask for it in your request if you need it.
17,000+ decisions in French, Danish, Spanish, Chinese, German, Italian, Dutch, Korean and other languages carry a stored English translation, and the translation is searched alongside the original.
Yes. Write to privacy@astraobp.com. A suppression list replaces the name with [redacted] in Libra and stops later crawls from restoring it. The original publication on the provider's site is theirs, not ours. See the privacy notice.
Request access
Send your name and a work email. A person at Astra adds you. Then sign in, no password.
Work email only. Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, and other free addresses are not accepted. Prefer to write? Email privacy@astraobp.com. Already invited? Sign in.